fbpx

Navigate / search

Is Headcovering a Distraction from the Gospel?

Are people who are passionate about headcovering “majoring in the minors” and is a movement dedicated to restoring this symbol a distraction from more important things? In this video we deal with this objection head-on.

This video is based off an article found here.

Is Head Covering Legalistic?

Head Covering Objections
The Objection: Head covering is legalistic and a return to the Law. We are saved by faith in Christ, not by what we do. Since it doesn’t affect our salvation, we don’t have to practice it.

Many who practice head covering today are viewed as legalistic. In order to comment on this charge, it’s important we first define the term. The word “legalism” isn’t found anywhere in the Bible nor is anyone in the Scriptures referred to as “legalistic.” It’s a word we’ve coined that refers to an incorrect view of law-keeping. Generally speaking, when someone is legalistic they’re doing one of two things:

  1. They believe their law-keeping makes (or keeps) them in a right-standing with God.
  2. They make laws out of issues that a Christian has liberty to decide for themselves.

For the first definition, it’s possible to be legalistic about any teaching in Scripture. Head covering should not be singled out, as no command is immune from this error. Read more

Covering Testimony: Amanda Gardiner

Amanda Gardiner Head Covering Testimonial
Name: Amanda GardinerAge: 25Location: Newfoundland, CanadaStarted Covering: March 2009

1) Introduce yourself to our readers.

My name is Amanda and I am a wife and mother of 3 beautiful children (all aged 4 and under).  I love singing, baking, reading and spending time with my little ones. Read more

Send this to a friend