This is going to sound a bit negative but I am trying to be objective here. “Headcovering Throughout Christian History” by David Philip is poorly written work in many ways. I point out two obvious ones –

1. It lacks any standard of academic writing. NO complete and trustworthy footnotes. I was irritated to find the way the author has provided footnotes and quotations.
2. There is no logical or sustained argument in the book. It is simply a book of quotations from multiple sources to support the author’s opinion. The quotes are to be discussed in their proper context for a fair presentation of the views of others. It is not an intelligent work.

I bought it thinking that it would be a useful source for my own study but was greatly disappointed at the quality of the writing.

I am sorry to say, David, that this is not a proper book in any way but just a collection of quotes although there is some good information that can be used for writing a real book.

I have also read your other book “Covered Glory” and it has similar issues as well. You got to write a proper book following academic standards of writing.

Thanks