Hello, my name is Jessica Lovely. I am 31 years old and I live in Gypsy, Kentucky, a small community nestled in the Appalachian Mountains. For the most part things are fairly simple around here. My husband goes to work in the log woods every day to provide for us. I home school all four of our children, all of which are in different grades. I love being a wife and a mother, God has truly blessed me with a wonderful family. I enjoy cooking for my family and taking evening walks with my kids and the dogs. I enjoy making lye soap and homemade chemical free deodorants and cleaners. Above all and most importantly I am a devoted child of God and feel very blessed at every opportunity (including this one) He gives me to spread the Gospel.
2) Where do you attend church? Tell us a little bit about it. Do others practice headcovering there?
I am blessed to attend Little Rachel Church, which is in the Waldo, Kentucky area. I attend services on Thursday nights and Sunday mornings. There is one other lady that practices head covering there besides myself and my daughter. We have become good friends and encourage one another and both agree that it feels nice not to be the only one there doing it, although if need be we would most defiantly stand alone in doing so. On occasions there are 2 other ladies that attend services that cover also. About 2 services ago, there were 5 of us, counting myself and my daughter there that were wearing head coverings, I must say that was a blessing to me. Read more
ここのコミュニティーの人たちは本当にすばらしいです。非常に多くのユダヤ人クリスチャンの方々が、イエス様に信仰を持ったゆえに、家族から絶縁されています。また洗礼式を行なうのも覚悟が要ります。というのも、うちの教会で洗礼式が行われるという情報が流れると、オーソドックス・ジュー(正統派ユダヤ教徒)の人々が教会に暴動を働きかけてくるからです。(なぜなら、一人のユダヤ人がバプテスマを受けるということは、ユダヤ人であることから離反すること(de-Jewed)を意味するからです。)このように自分が、クリスチャンという[イスラエルにおいては]少数派の一員であるという体験は、周りの文化ではなく、意識的に自分の信仰を実践し生きていくということを学ぶ上で大きな励みになっています。 Read more
Name: Rachael B. | Age: 28 | Location: Wyoming | Starting Covering: May 2016
1) Introduce yourself to our readers.
I have been a Christian for 9 years. My husband and I were in Bible studies led by a Godly mentor when we were in college and we chose to obey the gospel through baptism the same day. We married a year later and have been faithful to God and each other ever since. We have one daughter who is 2 years old. At the end of this year, we have committed to leave my husband’s military job so he can begin full time ministry work as a preacher.
I work part time as a massage therapist and teach natural birth education. Most of my time, I love being home with my daughter, making delicious and healthy food in the kitchen, and visiting the mountains.
2) Where do you attend church? Tell us a little bit about it. Do others practice headcovering there?
I worship with a local church of Christ that teaches the Bible in truth and spirit. We have lived and worshiped here for 4 years. Head covering is quite unorthodox here so I am the first woman to begin covering on my own initiative and there is only one other woman who is 90 that has worn a hat to church all her life.
3) What led you to start covering?
Six years ago, someone gave me a pamphlet on head coverings. At the time I was spiritually immature and afraid to read it for it might have told me something I didn’t want to hear or do contrary to the satisfactory explanation that head covering is a cultural matter. However, I never threw it away, but kept it, for no “apparent” reason. This past season, I was being taught in a personal bible study, exegetically going through all of 1 Corinthians verse by verse, which finally lead up to chapter 11. I knew it was there and was getting nervous but was ready to be brutally honest with God’s Word and obey Him with all my ability, regardless of the conclusion I came to regarding the text. I read and reread the chapter many times to become familiar with Paul’s words before reading the pamphlet so that I could decide for myself if it measured up. It seemed to confirm many of my suspicions about the argument that head covering is merely a cultural matter and was instead supported by Paul’s reasons. To my surprise it lit a wild fire in me, which resulted in countless hours of obsessive research, finding every piece of argument against head coverings that I could get my hands on. After I met with this teacher again (who does not believe that these instructions apply to us) to discuss this chapter after more research, I was convinced that the head covering applies directly to me and that I would need to start covering at once. The teacher respected my decision, which I’m thankful for. This has brought so much peace and joy to have faced and overcome one of the most difficult decisions I have ever had to make as a Christian in response to God’s Word!
I could go on and on about the details in the text I used to conveniently skim over (as do some commentators) to get to a cultural application conclusion, however I will only give one example of a compelling argument which has changed my mind. Most people assume that Paul gives these instructions to correct a wrong behavior within the culture, that women were disrespecting their authority by removing their head covering to be equal to men. However, Paul’s first words in this pericope are “Now I praise you because you remember me in everything and hold firmly to the traditions, just as I delivered them to you.” He actually praises or commends them for something they are doing right which is hard to come by in this entire letter. This was something he already delivered to them; previously taught them. Secondly “traditions” means apostolic teaching and the same word in greek is seen in 2 Thes 2:15 and 3:6. The tone Paul uses in these instructions (vs 2-16) is positive which is clearly seen in contrast to the very upset and negative tone he uses when immediately following, he corrects them about misusing and abusing the Lord’s supper (vs 17-34). Verse 17 he begins “But in giving this instruction, I do not praise you, because you come together not for the better but for the worse.” Verses 2 and 17 directly parallel one another about how he feels in giving each set of instructions. Until I saw this, I realized I had previously been practicing perfect eisegesis (inserting ideas into the text). I believe Paul’s reasons for writing to them about the head covering was to affirm the spiritual reasons why it is necessary (headship design vs3, creation vs7-9, angels vs10, appeal to nature vs13-15) and of course to correct anyone who was disregarding these instructions. Nowhere in this text does Paul argue culture being a reason. Instead he ends by reasoning that there are no opposing practices to these taught in the churches of God. Read more
The following article is a part of our re-blog series where we seek to give exposure to those who are writing interesting pieces on Complementarianism and head covering. We are not the author.
A Christian woman who was forced by DMV staff in Alabama to remove a headscarf she wore as a symbol of her faith in order to take a photo to renew her driver license is now suing local officials for violating her religious freedom rights under the U.S. and state constitutions.
The ACLU announced on Tuesday that it had filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of the Christian woman, Yvonne Allen of Tuskegee, asking the court to order DMV officials to allow her to retake her driver license photo with her headscarf intact.
“Today, the ACLU and ACLU of Alabama filed a federal lawsuit on Ms. Allen’s behalf, arguing that Lee County’s refusal to provide a religious accommodation to Ms. Allen violates her rights under the Alabama Constitution and the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The lawsuit asks the court to order Lee County officials to allow Ms. Allen to retake her driver license photo with her headscarf,” the ACLU said.
“Wearing a headscarf is an integral part of my Christian beliefs. In 2011, I moved with my children to Alabama after the end of a 12-year relationship with their father. I was lost, confused, hurt, and broken. But I turned to God and spent hours in prayer and study. During that time, it became clear to me that, to be obedient to God’s Word and show my submission to Him, I had to cover my hair on a daily basis. In 1 Corinthians 11, Paul speaks very clearly without ambiguity about this. I have followed this command every day since and believe that removing my headscarf in public is extremely shameful and dishonors God,” Allen first wrote in a statement on the issue in April.
According to the lawsuit, Allen visited the DMV office in Auburn on Dec. 29, 2015, to renew her expired license and was told she had to remove her head covering and eyeglasses in order to take the photo for the document.
“No ma’am, I don’t uncover my hair,” Allen said she told the clerk.
“She asked me, ‘Is it for religious purposes?'”
“I smiled, ‘Yes, ma’am,'” said Allen.
The clerk then asked Allen if she was Muslim and when Allen told her she is Christian the clerk told her that she would have to remove the headscarf.
“Ms. Allen informed the clerk that she does not uncover her hair. In response, the clerk asked her, ‘Is it for religious purposes?’ Ms. Allen responded, ‘Yes ma’am.’ The clerk then asked, ‘Are you Muslim?’ When Ms. Allen explained that she is a Christian, the clerk told her, ‘No, then you need to uncover your hair. Only Muslim women have the right to cover their hair in the driver license photos,'” the lawsuit said. Read more
[Présentation de la série : Cet article fait partie d’une série qui examinera ce que certaines grandes figures de l’histoire de l’église croyaient à propos du voile. Leurs arguments, leurs choix de langage et leurs conclusions ne sont pas forcément en accord avec ce que nous croyons. Le but de cette série est de vous exposer fidèlement les idées de ces personnes sur la question du voile, et non de sélectionner uniquement ce qui représenterait notre position.]
Saint Augustin (354-430 ap J-C) exerçait la tâche d’évêque à Hippone (l’actuelle Annaba, en Algérie). Il est l’un des plus notables “Docteurs de l’Église” d’après le Catholicisme romain, et reste considéré par beaucoup d’évangéliques comme l’un des pères théologiques de la Réforme Protestante à cause de ses enseignements sur le salut et la Grâce. Il est particulièrement connu pour ses livres “Les confessions” et “La cité de Dieu“.
Augustin reçut un jour une lettre de son ami Possidius qui était évêque à Calama, contenant de nombreuses questions pastorales. Entre autres, Possidius demandait si il fallait autoriser “les bijoux d’or et les vêtements coûteux ?“. Augustin lui répondit que cela n’avait pas à être interdit “sauf dans le cas de ceux qui ne sont pas encore mariés ou qui ne comptent pas se marier.” car ces personnes “doivent avoir pour unique pensée celle de plaire à Dieu.” Et il justifia la permission faite aux époux de se décorer par ce verset “celui qui est marié se préoccupe des affaires de ce monde, des moyens de plaire à sa femme.” (1 Cor 7:32-34)
Augustin ne voyait donc aucun inconvénient à ce qu’on se fasse beau pour son époux. Cependant il avait quand-même une restriction à cette permissivité. Il écrit “Il ne convient pas pourtant que les femmes, même celles qui sont mariées, laissent voir leurs cheveux : l’Apôtre veut qu’elles soient voilées “. Nous voyons donc ici, que même s’il permettait aux femmes mariées de porter des ornements et des vêtements précieux, elles n’avaient cependant pas le droit de découvrir leur tête. Le fait qu’il affirme que ce qu’il dit est valable “même” pour les femmes mariées, montre que les femmes seules étaient aussi tenues de se couvrir la tête. Le fait qu’il traitait une situation déjà moderne par rapport au temps où vécut l’apôtre, indique qu’Augustin ne considérait pas le voile comme quelque chose de culturel, mais bien comme une prescription à laquelle tous devraient obéir, y compris à son époque et en Afrique du Nord 1) Toutes les citations de ce paragraphe sont tirées de la “Lettre 245” qui peut être lue en ligne ici :http://abbaye-saint-benoit.ch/saints/augustin/lettres/s004/l245.htmRead more